NebPreps Girls Class B Basketball Computer Ratings 1-6-26

Jan 6, 2026Preps Computer Ratings, Girls Basketball Ratings

RANK	TEAM	WINS	LOSSES	SOS	SOS RK	PPG	PAPG	RATING
1	Bennington	10	0	52.5	17	68.5	36.1	99.35
2	Norris	8	1	50.9	22	56.0	37.8	89.69
3	Blair	5	1	46.3	29	57.3	35.7	89.46
4	Sidney	9	1	48.4	26	51.0	31.3	71.66
5	Lincoln Pius X	7	2	55.2	7	53.3	39.6	68.43
6	Gretna East	6	4	53.9	11	50.6	45.2	66.85
7	York	5	2	52.7	16	41.6	37.1	65.14
8	Beatrice	7	2	57.3	2	43.6	35.6	64.4
9	Waverly	4	4	54.1	10	42.0	38.1	63.63
10	Omaha Gross Catholic	7	2	54.8	8	55.7	43.0	60.17
11	Scottsbluff	7	3	41.4	34	55.5	43.3	59.74
12	Aurora	5	3	56.7	4	41.4	39.9	57.95
13	Omaha Duchesne Academy	5	2	43.9	33	53.0	31.4	57.06
14	Gretna	5	4	50.1	23	41.6	40.6	55.03
15	Elkhorn North	4	4	51.8	20	51.1	51.9	53.04
16	Adams Central	4	4	53.8	12	44.1	38.6	50.69
17	Northwest	4	5	54.2	9	47.3	49.2	50.2
18	Seward	4	5	53.2	15	50.0	49.0	47.66
19	Gering	5	5	59.5	1	45.9	48.2	45.5
20	Nebraska City	3	6	45.4	31	42.8	38.4	43.46
21	Omaha Skutt Catholic	3	8	55.2	6	44.6	49.9	42.94
22	Lexington	4	6	53.3	14	44.8	47.6	41.81
23	Lincoln Standing Bear	3	4	48.7	25	38.3	41.3	41.68
24	Elkhorn	3	6	57.0	3	39.3	43.7	40.68
25	Columbus Lakeview	3	5	47.0	28	40.8	40.8	39.72
26	McCook	3	6	50.0	24	36.1	42.0	36.36
27	Omaha Mercy	3	5	55.4	5	38.9	52.6	36.0
28	Plattsmouth	2	7	53.4	13	45.3	56.1	30.43
29	Alliance	2	8	52.1	19	33.4	48.8	29.71
30	Lincoln Northwest	2	5	45.5	30	36.3	52.0	29.27
31	Crete	1	9	51.2	21	35.2	47.3	29.06
32	Hastings	1	7	48.2	27	26.8	46.8	26.25
33	Ralston	0	8	52.2	18	19.0	57.9	7.14
34	Schuyler	0	8	45.0	32	15.9	55.2	6.86

How We Calculate Ratings

Our computer ratings go beyond win-loss records to measure true team strength. The model considers margin of victory, strength of schedule, home vs. away performance, and opponent quality. Ratings are recalculated after each week’s games, so every result matters. A rating of 50 represents an average team in each class, with higher ratings indicating stronger teams.

← NebPreps Girls Class A Basketball Computer Ratings 1-6-26 NebPreps Debuts Analytical, Comprehensive Ratings System →