NebPreps Girls Class C2 Basketball Computer Ratings 1-6-26

Jan 6, 2026Preps Computer Ratings

RANKTEAMWINSLOSSESSOSSOS RKPPGPAPGRATING
1Pender9150.22462.432.192.4
2Elkhorn Valley8050.62162.225.086.97
3Oakland-Craig9156.4357.339.279.73
4Guardian Angels Central Catholic8155.7554.439.779.49
5Hastings St. Cecilia7154.31052.632.675.4
6Alma8142.85161.723.274.33
7Centura8254.7750.628.273.9
8Thayer Central9147.73755.432.273.43
9Sandy Creek9150.02749.634.072.92
10Johnson County Central6353.31539.925.668.99
11West Holt8243.05053.534.667.63
12Hershey6256.0453.443.867.56
13Crofton9349.13451.238.366.12
14Freeman7252.81650.835.964.47
15Valentine8250.12553.043.163.98
16Elmwood-Murdock8153.91243.031.262.67
17Stanton7247.44045.433.662.2
18Aquinas Catholic7252.41857.846.661.46
19Yutan6248.83549.838.260.65
20Perkins County5457.7250.349.258.0
21Johnson-Brock6450.12645.936.956.0
22Ponca6445.64445.637.854.09
23Laurel-Concord-Coleridge6453.61354.452.951.85
24Giltner/Harvard7337.35347.842.850.6
25Humphrey-Lindsay5449.93045.237.850.34
26Southern6446.24241.235.150.16
27Walthill3344.64646.746.850.07
28Nebraska Christian6349.63244.240.850.02
29Mitchell5443.44944.041.749.95
30Kimball4344.84542.337.049.38
31Cedar Bluffs6538.75239.633.448.63
32Shelby-Rising City5447.73837.440.145.72
33Centennial4554.7844.745.245.43
34Wisner-Pilger4649.63346.945.644.35
35Wood River3548.53634.841.141.75
36Summerland4447.43946.447.041.65
37Maxwell3449.92844.944.140.04
38Norfolk Catholic5552.81740.145.939.93
39Bergan Catholic4654.5941.650.938.89
40Twin River4443.94739.141.637.2
41St. Paul4649.83137.945.936.77
42Doniphan-Trumbull3450.62237.750.136.11
43Ord4650.52342.549.535.85
44Ravenna3746.04332.337.232.49
45Arcadia/Loup City3653.61430.844.728.91
46Tekamah-Herman3743.74832.445.027.79
47Hemingford1749.92938.951.526.09
48Gibbon2855.6630.954.520.54
49Gordon-Rushville1751.81930.553.619.05
50Superior11046.44127.150.514.97
51H&H0954.01134.760.410.77
52North Platte St. Patrick's01065.7124.757.23.79
53Lutheran High Northeast0851.52024.560.62.52
How We Calculate Ratings
Our computer ratings go beyond win-loss records to measure true team strength. The model considers margin of victory, strength of schedule, home vs. away performance, and opponent quality. Ratings are recalculated after each week’s games, so every result matters. A rating of 50 represents an average team in each class, with higher ratings indicating stronger teams.